
Custom Assignments
When standard scopes are not enough.
Some technical challenges cannot be handled through standard service descriptions, predefined work packages, or conventional consulting models.
These situations are often:
-
high-risk,
-
safety-critical,
-
legally sensitive,
-
or reputationally exposed.
eMOBINO provides confidential, expert-level technical direction for cases where organizations need clarity, not visibility.
The scope below is not limited to the listed examples.
Critical Safety & Incident Advisory
Battery- and power-related incidents demand experience, judgment, and restraint.
In many organizations, especially after incidents involving fire, thermal events, or accidents, there is no internal authority capable of forming a defensible technical opinion.
Typical support includes:
-
Technical advisory for battery- and power-system related incidents
-
Independent assessment of potential failure mechanisms
-
High-level interpretation of limited, fragmented, or incomplete data
-
Identification of plausible root-cause scenarios based on system behavior
-
Safety-oriented framing of technical findings for management decision-making
This support may apply to:
-
development-phase testing incidents,
-
validation or abuse testing outcomes,
-
or field events occurring during operation or after sales.
The objective is not speculation, but credible technical direction grounded in system-level understanding.
Fire Inspection & Hazard Analysis Direction
Fire-related events are among the most sensitive challenges organizations face.
They involve:
-
safety risk,
-
regulatory exposure,
-
legal implications,
-
and reputational impact.
eMOBINO supports organizations by providing:
-
Direction for fire and hazard inspection from an engineering perspective
-
Structured analysis of possible electrical, thermal, and mechanical triggers
-
System-level reasoning across inverter, HV distribution, battery, and interfaces
-
Guidance on evidence interpretation without contaminating investigation processes
-
Support in defining next technical steps and containment actions
This role is advisory and directional, designed to support decision-makers and investigation teams without interfering with legal or regulatory processes.
Post-Incident Technical Assessment
After an incident, the most dangerous phase is often the interpretation phase.
Decisions taken based on weak or incorrect assumptions can lead to:
-
repeated failures,
-
incorrect countermeasures,
-
or long-term safety exposure.
Typical scope includes:
-
Post-incident technical review based on available information
-
Reconstruction of likely event sequences at system level
-
Identification of design, integration, or boundary condition weaknesses
-
Differentiation between primary causes and secondary consequences
-
Recommendations for design elevation or operational mitigation
The emphasis is on technical plausibility and defensibility, not blame assignment.
High-Risk Abuse & Non-Standard Scenarios
Some test results or field observations fall outside normal qualification envelopes.
These may include:
-
unexpected abuse test outcomes,
-
combined electrical–thermal–mechanical stress cases,
-
borderline operating conditions,
-
or interactions not covered by standard validation matrices.
Support includes:
-
Interpretation of abuse test results at system level
-
Direction on whether outcomes indicate design weakness or test artefacts
-
Guidance on additional verification steps or design reinforcement
-
Support in defining realistic safety boundaries
Confidential Root-Cause Direction
In certain situations, organizations need an independent technical voice that can think freely, without internal pressure, politics, or fear of exposure. eMOBINO provides:
-
Independent root-cause direction under strict confidentiality
-
Cross-domain reasoning spanning electronics, software, thermal, and system integration
-
Support for leadership when internal consensus cannot be reached
-
A defensible technical narrative to support strategic decisions
This service is often used when:
-
internal teams lack experience in similar incidents,
-
external consultants avoid liability-sensitive topics,
-
or the cost of being wrong is exceptionally high.
Cross-Domain & Non-Standard Challenges
Some challenges simply do not fit predefined categories.
Examples include:
-
multi-domain system interactions,
-
legacy designs facing new operating conditions,
-
unexpected behavior after platform changes,
-
or one-off scenarios that cannot be generalized.
These cases are handled as custom, tightly scoped expert assignments, defined case by case.
Confidentiality & Discretion
All Custom Assignments are handled with absolute confidentiality.
Engagements are:
-
strictly need-to-know,
-
minimally visible,
-
and structured to protect both technical and reputational interests.
Documentation, communication, and access are tailored to the sensitivity of each case.
Some problems are not solved by more data.
They are solved by experience, restraint, and the ability to see systems as a whole.
Custom Assignments exist for those moments.



